Wednesday, May 25, 2011

arnold schwarzenegger terminator face

arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • IJ Reilly
    Jul 10, 05:45 PM
    Part of the problem is the way they market it. There was such an emphasis on templates and graphic-intensive stuff when it was first demoed in MacWorld 2005 that it's hard to think it can be a good word processor. My first thought was how it looked 100x better than Microsoft Publisher.

    Again, I think this latest rumor shows that Apple will address some of the perceptions (or misperceptions, depending on who you ask) by allowing people to dive into word processing mode and adding better search and research functions. It just might make me a convert.

    I entirely agree with you on these points. Apple is barely marketing iWork at all, let alone in a way which would help people understand its value. At MW last January I made a point of mentioning the Mac owner confusion over what Pages does to one of the reps on the floor who was demonstrating the new version. He also happened to be on the Pages programming team. (Which game me an opportunity to show him a bug I'd found. :))

    He seemed surprised to be hearing what I was telling him, and I wasn't entirely sure he believed me in the end, but perhaps this rumor reflects some understanding on Apple's part that they're not getting the message out about these applications, particularly Pages. Maybe they'll get serious about marketing in version 3.

    One other thing, I think Apple ought to be bundling iWork with most if not all of their systems, and not necessarily because we like to get free booty. The more Mac owners used iWork, the more who would see the value in forking out for the upgrades. This is exactly how Apple already markets iLife, so why they're not doing this for iWork is just plain mystifying.





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger



  • MaxMike
    Nov 28, 07:27 PM
    A new Apple TV to stream from my Mac to my HDTV, a Wireless-N router to speed up sharing between computers from my Wireless-G network, a good webcam for my Mac Mini, and some cash for my future Apple purchases (MBP and iPad 2G)

    http://www.gadgetvenue.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/new-apple-tv-300x288.jpg

    http://gadgets.softpedia.com/images/gadgets/gallery/large/Linksys-Wireless-N-WRT310N-Gigabit-Router-1.jpg

    http://www.connectreviews.com/images/logitech_quickcampro9000_1.jpg

    http://www.collegefashion.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/money.jpg





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • bluebomberman
    Jul 12, 02:31 PM
    Snowy-

    Any professional copy shop should be able to take your sequential, 5.5" x 8.5" size pages and turn it into a booklet with binding in the middle. My understanding is that they have super-expensive machines that can do that without much effort.

    I don't think you need to futz around with a non-sequential layout unless you plan to print this out yourself without the use of fancy $40,000+ copiers.





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • Triplenickle
    Oct 24, 09:00 AM
    I was disappointed that the resolution was not updated to 1920x1200...I would assume this would have added siginificant costs? or maybe they think the current resolution is good enough and that there is little noticable difference between the current vs 1920x1200 ? Anyone else feel this is a big deal? Reasons why the higher resolution is not necessary? Thanks



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • wovel
    Apr 28, 12:53 PM
    No in bogo they BOTH make money. Verizon, Att, Tmobile and Sprint have already paid retail for the phone before customers recieve the contract price. Apple, Samsung, HTC etc have already made their money. Telcos now have to make their money over time with the contract.

    So Bogo makes them money also.

    There are no android devices of any kind that outsell the iPhone. Not even the cheap ones, not even the free ones. There are no phones at all that outsell the iPhone 4 worldwide. In the US they all also fall below the 3GS and the iPhone 4.





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • Scallywag
    Sep 30, 12:14 PM
    Okay, this guy must live in a "garden" apartment or something. I live in NYC and the only place I drop calls 100% of the time is near the Verizon building by the Brooklyn Bridge. Irony of ironies.

    But my dropped call percentage is less that 5%.

    I live in Hell's Kitchen, and I rarely drop calls here, though data speeds during rush hour are pathetically slow.

    I walk near Union Square every day on my way home from work, and every single time I'm at 5th Ave & 13th st. I drop a call... every single time... I can never hold a call near union square.

    AT&T service is really not good in NYC. There's no point in my getting a 3Gs for faster 3G... it's all slow here, regardless of the model iPhone.

    I drop about 15-20% of my calls. Near Union Square I drop 75-80% easily.



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger.



  • lordonuthin
    Nov 24, 05:06 PM
    I've got my passkey! Now I have a couple of my machines working on units. I have a small Linux Render farm that I'll put online here shortly.

    Oh, please do get that render farm going! Well, when you have some time anyway :p

    Also you can put the passkey in all instances of folding that you are running that way it you will get as much credit as possible.





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • Chimera
    Oct 24, 07:43 AM
    Good little speed upgrade, though many will complain about no Mag latch or easy access HD bay. Hopefully I should be getting one soon. :)



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • MacProCpo
    Nov 27, 03:44 AM
    8 WUs down, working on 9, and one more to go before I can get into bigadv.......:D

    Does anyone have experience working with GPU2 and ATI cards? I've been playing around with my 4870 GPUs in Windoze and they don't seem to be running any faster then SMP in OSX. I've followed the the ATI GPU install guide on the f@h website i just don't know what I'm supposed to be seeing with regards to productivity.

    Cheers and Happy Thanksgiving!





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • iLilana
    Mar 31, 10:43 AM
    integrate iChat and face time already!!!!



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • lordonuthin
    Oct 28, 06:24 PM
    Nice. Those amd machines add up since you have so many. How do you deal with heat?


    The heat is an issue, for now I can open windows and use fans but by next summer I will have to do something about it. I'm actually contemplating cutting a hole in the basement floor (concrete) and digging down several feet to place a tubing coil that could be used to cool the cpu's directly with water blocks. That would require a manifold to distribute the coolant to all of the cpu's and possibly gpu's. That might be cheaper electric wise but would take money and time to implement. Wait a sec, I just realized I already have a hole in the floor for the sump, hmmmm. Anyway I have some time to contemplate the possibilities, and I can do all of the work myself. I know some folks in the heating/cooling business that could help design a system so I will maybe talk with them at some point. Another possibility is a small window ac just for the computer room or moving everything to the basement where it is cooler anyway... but damp in the spring. Lots of possibilities - Google is my friend :D





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • Aetherhole
    Mar 16, 08:10 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

    In line at Fashion Island. #6 in line. Here we go again!



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • aardwolf
    Apr 15, 03:50 PM
    And dropbox now works without the plist hack

    The Dropbox forum build has been working without the plist hack for over a week. Check out http://www.dropbox.com/forums to get it.





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • rhett7660
    Feb 25, 11:20 AM
    As it is looking, looks like the show might be done period. Which just sucks. One of my favorite shows too! :mad:



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • kiljoy616
    Apr 13, 03:07 PM
    Id love to see a new standard for "HD". 1440p would be nice...but current media would have to catch up. That said, I dont think Apple could make a cost effective television. Sorry, but theyd sell a 42inch TV for 2000.000 easy.

    Are you kidding Sony sells that Apple would make it a unibody aluminum tv and price it 5000 easy.:eek:

    It would sport of course Airplay and Retinal on a 60" model in other words 4K TV for the masses. :-P





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • Infinity
    Jul 24, 06:36 PM
    I don't care much for a bluetoothed version of this P.O.S.
    At the moment the Mighty mouse has heaps of potential to be a great mouse if only Apple fixes the current issues it encounters such as sometimes not being able to scroll downwards, erratically activating expose (side buttons) when I don't even have my fingers near there and other few quirks....

    Now if its going to be bluethooth, it'll be harder to tell whether its the mouse or the bluetooth faulting.



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • lmalave
    Oct 19, 08:09 AM
    Heh heh...yeah me too. Maybe that's what The Steve (tm) was referring to when he said that '07 was going to be one of the most exciting years for Apple yet.

    Or it could just be a new colour range for the iPod nanos.

    I don't think Apple will come out with a "consumer" tower for the foreseeable future. I think Apple's strategy is to make "consumer" products like the Mini which are made to look more like consumer electronic devices (e.g. look like a stereo or DVD players). A tower just does not fit that category. Apple makes the Mac Pro for professionals that will actually put in a specialized video or audio card for their *professional* work. And yes, a consumer like a gamer might want that expandability just so they can get the latest and greatest gaming video card, but Apple is *not* going to aim for that category anytime soon because: 1) it's a small fraction of the market compared to the overall consumer market, and 2) the PC owns the gaming market. And why would Apple want to go for the PC gaming market anyway? A disproportionate amount of gamers just build "white box" computers so they can optimize everything to their liking for the lowest cost, and that's *definitely* not Apple's market.





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. Arnie goes off half faced.
  • Arnie goes off half faced.



  • FloatingBones
    Nov 25, 12:34 AM
    For the last time, STOP SPEAKING FOR OTHER PEOPLE!!! You have NO right what-so-ever to speak for anyone but yourself and yet you continue to state that EVER SINGLE iOS USER hates Flash and is glad to be rid of it and yet this Skyfire app proves just the opposite.

    What I said: Users of the 120M+ iOS devices are doing just fine without Flash plugins is completely true. There are no Flash plugins for this device. Nobody can run a shred of Flash content in their browser on this device.

    No amount of nonsensical shouting will change the facts.

    You have every right to give your opinion on the matter, but it is your opinion, not the opinion of every single iOS user in existence.

    But owners of those 120M+ iOS devices are doing just fine without Flash. Nobody forced them to buy those devices. If they were somehow "disappointed" because there are no Flash plugins available, nobody prevented them from returning them or reselling them.

    That is NOT a shortcoming of Flash dude.

    Also incorrect. There are huge shortcomings of Flash, and you've never addressed them.

    You've never addressed the identity-leaking of Flash cookies: Flash doesn't honor the cookie privacy settings of the browser. More than half of the top 100 websites are now using Flash cookies to track users and store information about them. (http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-209.txt) Do you actually like the fact that those sites do an end-run around the cookie privacy settings by using Flash? I can't find a single rational person that likes the identity-leaking.

    You've never addressed the quirkiness that Flash brings to the browser UI. On my Mac, scrolling works differently when my mouse is over a Flash region. Certain keyboard shortcuts cease to work. Text that appears in a Flash window is not searchable with the browser's text-finding feature. My Mac doesn't behave like a Mac inside of a Flash window.

    The engineering choice made for iOS is simplicity. Layering Flash on top of the browser would compromise that simplicity. Click-to-flash semantics would add yet another layer of clutter and obfuscation to the UI.

    You've never addressed Adobe's inability to deal competently to secure their software. Security experts believe that Adobe is going to surpass Microsoft as the #1 target for security attacks. (http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-231.htm) Besides Flash, Adobe Reader is a vector for zero day bugs (http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-273.txt). I really don't know how you do that: it's a PDF reader! The bugs have been around in Adobe Reader for years and Adobe still hasn't fixed them.

    If Apple enabled Flash in iOS Safari, they would be farming out the correct operation of their iOS browser to a company that has proven to be one of the least competent companies in dealing with malware attacks. Noted security expert Steve Gibson mocks their cluelessness:

    "[Adobe:] how is that quarterly update cycle going for you?" (http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-273.txt)

    I have yet to find a single Flash enthusiast who can address those issues. I'm hardly surprised that you can't address them, either.

    That is a shortcoming of Steve Jobs' choosing.

    Nonsense. They are engineering and design choices. If Apple made bad engineering and design choices, they would never have sold 120M+ of these devices.

    If you think they are a "shortcoming": there are simple solutions. Don't buy an iOS device. If you did buy one, sell it. Or maybe you can see if it will blend (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAl28d6tbko).

    One thing is certain: Apple will not compromise their iOS browser with Flash, and complaining about that is rather silly.

    Even if Flash is on the road to becoming obsolete, that doesn't mean people don't want to be able to access the entire Web in the here and now.

    Adobe Flash is on the road to becoming obsolete. Even Adobe acknowledges the fact (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1039999).

    Between the 120M+ iOS devices, the click-to-flash plugins disable Flash downloads on Windows, Mac OS X and Linux machines, and Adobe's new Flash-to-HTML5 conversion tools (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1039999), the abandonment of Flash will continue to accelerate.

    You just don't seem to comprehend that.

    You are correct. Flash is a legacy technology, and its day has passed.

    You seem to have this deep seated hatred of Flash

    There are fundamental failings in both the design and deployment of Flash. I listed three of those earlier in my reply.

    The thing that got my attention was when I realized that Flash was maintaining its own set of cookies and that those cookies did not honor the privacy settings of my browser. I then learned about click-to-flash plugins to minimize my exposure to Flash. The shocking thing to me was how much disabling Flash improved the browsing experience: faster page loads, less flashing advertisements, and far less CPU usage.

    and I can tell that if Steve had said "I LOVE Flash" instead you would almost undoubtedly be here fighting against HTML5 and for Flash.

    You imply that I blindly agree with Apple's (and Jobs's) decisions. That is not the case.

    I strongly disagree with Apple's decision to prevent Hypermac from selling external batteries for Mac computers (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1032695). Hypermac makes a quality product, and they are filling a niche that Apple ignores. Magsafe is a wonderful technology, but they should be licensing this tech to third-party vendors. I fondly hope that Apple addresses this deficiency in their strategy and product accessories soon.

    If you search, you can find where I commented on this in the public record weeks ago.

    Yes, I honestly believe that. You have no vested interest in either one. You're just being Steve's doormat.

    Now you know better.

    I see no reason why ANYONE should have to convert to HTML5.

    Too many laptop users are tired of the CPU loading and battery suck of Flash apps.

    Too many users don't like that Flash alters the UI inside of the browsers: altered scrolling behavior, keyboard shortcuts that don't work in Flash, text searches that don't work with text in a Flash app.

    Too many privacy advocates are bothered that Flash maintains a separate set of cookies and those cookies do not honor the privacy settings of the browser. Commercial websites are using those Flash cookies to track users. (http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-209.txt)

    Too many security advocates are wary of using Adobe products because of Adobe's poor track record against security attacks.


    Even if all those four large concerns were addressed, websites have to deal with the growing number of users that use Flash-blocking plugins. Advertisers that deliver their ads with Flash have no guarantee that users will allow those Flash apps to be downloaded and run on their machines.


    Those are the reasons why Flash's viability for delivering web content is in decline. Even if you don't see the reasons, Adobe does (http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/10/adobe-demos-flash-to-html5-conversion-tool.html).





    arnold schwarzenegger terminator face. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger



  • maclaptop
    Apr 14, 04:50 PM
    Anyone feel confident buying a white one given the problems they've had getting one made?

    I wouldn't take the chance, it's upgrade price is going to be $399 :eek:





    NickZac
    Feb 1, 08:57 AM
    Nope. Certainly not mine…

    Are you the same NickZac who posts in PRSI? :confused:

    I don't know what a PRSI is. Grr


    You know, it's almost like you meant "idol" in jest, and people are taking you seriously... :D

    I shouldn't complain too much...least people here take me crazy :(





    grassland
    Apr 11, 06:57 PM
    outport





    jhu
    Oct 23, 08:23 PM
    how is this any different than apple's end user-license agreement for mac os x? here is section 2A (http://images.apple.com/legal/sla/macosx104.pdf):


    This License allows you to install and use one copy of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled computer at a time. This License does not allow the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer at a time, and you may not make the Apple Software available over a network where it could be used by multiple computer at the same time.

    the language implies that virtualization on the same machine using the same software is forbidden. on the other hand, windows xp's end-user licence agreement (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/eula.mspx) also has similar language disallowing multiple copies of the same software to be run on the same computer:

    1.1 Installation and use. You may install, use, access, display and run one copy of the Software on a single computer, such as a workstation, terminal or other device ("Workstation Computer"). The Software may not be used by more than one processor at any one time on any single Workstation Computer.

    microsoft's vista license just makes the virtualization part explicit. so i don't know what the hubub is over vista's license since the mac os x and windows xp licenses say the same thing, but not explicitly.





    chrispholt
    Jun 6, 05:49 AM
    My brother has a android phone (:mad:) and if he buys an app from the android market and doesn't like it he can get a refund and it is deleted. I think it is in a 15 minute time gap.

    However this would be a nice feature to the apple app store.





    joeshell383
    Dec 20, 01:58 AM
    V.I.S.T.A (Virus Infections Spyware Trojans Adware)


    I like that one :D



    No comments:

    Post a Comment