Tuesday, May 31, 2011

constellations in sky

constellations in sky. Constellations
  • Constellations



  • lordonuthin
    Nov 18, 07:57 PM
    ^yeah almost seems unfair to ppl that want to compete but dont have access to high end hardware. i guess if you look at it from an aggregate standpoint then low point crunchers make a bit of a diff.

    the amount of power sucked from the wall per unit would be WAY less i would imagine. from an environmental standpoint it wouldnt make sense

    That's why I dropped the G5 after I saw how little it was doing against the Mac Pro and even the low end amd's, it just wasn't worth it in terms of the electric bill.

    And speaking of electric bills... I'm just kind of guessing here but I think folding is costing me about $50 a month :eek:





    constellations in sky. various constellations in a
  • various constellations in a



  • Delicious-Apple
    Dec 3, 04:48 AM
    The iPod will gain a wireless dock (or wireless functionality integrated) so it can communicate with the other components such as iTV and wireless speaker systems that Apple are supposedly experimenting with.





    constellations in sky. see that the constellation
  • see that the constellation



  • X-Z
    Feb 22, 05:33 AM
    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1751007/setup03.JPG





    constellations in sky. stock photo : Constellations
  • stock photo : Constellations



  • paeza
    Oct 24, 12:35 AM
    Could anyone tell me what is "Santa Rosa " ?





    constellations in sky. .com/constellations/pisces
  • .com/constellations/pisces



  • Lukeit
    Mar 31, 08:49 PM
    Just a quick question: how to make a full, clean installation of Lion preview 2 starting from the app downloaded from Appstore?
    Do you have to restore it as dmg on a external drive to boot from or is there any other way?

    Thanks guys!





    constellations in sky. Starry Night Sky
  • Starry Night Sky



  • Chundles
    Apr 3, 05:04 AM
    Recent files now show in the Dock menu of closed and open apps (not sure if this is new), clicking show recents shows them as tiles like as in DP1

    279465

    Spotlight has smaller icons and Google and Wikipedia (been mentioned), but now has dictionary meanings again and the pronunciation

    279468

    Directory Utility now has an editor which is like OS X Server's Workgroup Manager. presumably as Server will be included now.

    279467
    - can press ctrl+up again to close Mission Control, doesnt work with ctrl-down for Expos� app windows though
    - the Sites folder in home is gone (Apache and Web Sharing still there though)

    overall things just seem a little quicker, animations are smoother and getting less Dock, SystemUIServer & Finder crashes. still a few crashes and UI bugs around the place.

    If you scroll up over the icon of a closed app in the dock you see thumbnails of those recent files. Pretty cool.





    constellations in sky. Dimensions - Celestial
  • Dimensions - Celestial



  • alphaod
    Mar 24, 01:25 PM
    I'd love to move up on to a 6970� as long as we don't get it when the 7xxx is about to be released.





    constellations in sky. Constellations in a night sky
  • Constellations in a night sky



  • Flowbee
    Sep 6, 08:05 PM
    still think the prices are a little steep for things that can be watched on an ipod. Sure you can use the output from the dock to play it on your tv, but if you have a slightly big tv, it doesn't look DVD quality.

    You don't need the dock, you can just use a cable (http://podophile.com/2006/08/16/watch-ipod-videos-on-your-tv/).

    I have to believe that movie downloads will be higher quality than the current TV shows.





    constellations in sky. .com/constellations/lynx/
  • .com/constellations/lynx/



  • Doctor Q
    Oct 4, 07:16 PM
    Congrats, twoodcc! Your computer is da man!





    constellations in sky. The Deep Sky Objects of
  • The Deep Sky Objects of



  • islanders
    Dec 30, 11:25 AM
    People would complain about not being able to drive it in hot weather and having to buy expensive Apple iWax.

    no it would run on methane gas, would only be able to turn to the left, and you couldn't roll down the windows :eek:





    constellations in sky. Constellations
  • Constellations



  • PodHead
    Dec 1, 10:22 PM
    You know what I would like with iTV?

    Live content.

    Think about it for a moment. I think everyone hates how expensive cable TV is. I am paying $45 per month just for 50 channels or so, with maybe 10 of those I actually watch (the networks, MSNBC, NESN, FSNE, ESPN, and a few other random ones).

    Apple has the TV Shows issue fixed, thanks to $1.99 per show on iTunes and season passes.

    However, live content is the big issue. I would love to ditch my cable tv subscription and go soley iTV. But I like to watch sports, especially baseball and football. Also you need TV for news events, especially breaking news. iTV and iTunes does not (yet) allow you to watch live streaming content.

    If Apple could somehow strike a deal to cover sports and other live content such as news...that just really opens the door. Major League Baseball already does it with MLB.TV, except it is browser based. Imagine the same thing, but on iTV!?!?

    Do that, and I would seriously cancel my cable tv subscription and go a la carte with iTunes. I spend roughly $540 a year on my 50 channels of cable TV, of which I at most watch 10 channels. I would much rather spend say $270 (half of the $540) on the 5 or so shows I watch, plus season passes for my local baseball and football teams, and the news channel of my choice.

    That is where iTV could become a real winner.

    I'm in the same boat!! Except I live in Japan. I rely solely on iTunes to watch my favorite shows in the U.S. But...I usually have to wait an extra day (not including the day it takes to appear on iTunes) to watch them. By the time the Packers have won (being optimistic) I'm two, sometimes three days behind (or ahead depending how you look at it) the news. I would totally stay up til 3:00 am to watch them live from the states.:p





    constellations in sky. South sky star chart include
  • South sky star chart include



  • ezekielrage_99
    Aug 16, 10:49 AM
    I would like wireless upload for an iPod but I really have the quality of wireless headphones.





    constellations in sky. constellation sky after
  • constellation sky after



  • JoeG4
    Feb 27, 01:39 AM
    https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/_zZDRx0MKYqE/TWn-nxGOdrI/AAAAAAAABDY/-YhcSkl57lw/s800/IMG_0591.JPG

    I finally got a new chair. My 7 year old awesome chair sits up in my bedroom making an awesome tv chair now. :D

    Since the theme lately is "Show how your desk REALLY looks!" this one has a pile of papers on the desk and some random chair assembly stuff laying around as my mother bought a chair too! lol. :D





    constellations in sky. Therefore this part of the sky
  • Therefore this part of the sky



  • KnightWRX
    Apr 27, 01:12 PM
    I was simply suggesting that Apple used the term "App" as a familiar leaning to the way they call software "Applications" in Mac OS. Also, Apple have being refering to software that runs on their operating systems as "Applications" since 1980: -

    The Apple Lisa (precursor to the original 1984 Macintosh) had an Applications folder in 1980.

    http://www.guidebookgallery.org/articles/inventingthelisauserinterface/pics/fig6

    The Macintosh has obviously had an Applications folder from 1984 to present

    In terms of GUI history and it's conventions, there was the Xerox Alto as far back as 1973 but from all the screen shot hunting I've done, it seems to have no Applications or Programs folder because it has a "starting point" (indicated by the Start box) and then a list of files to open, some of which end in .run which presumably are executable programs/applications: -

    http://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/input-output/14/347/1857

    So yeah, "The Macintosh" wasn't the first GUI that had APPlicationS but Apple appear to have a LOT of prior use of the term with the Lisa OS before it in 1980 and GUI consistency between Mac OS X and iOS being a cut down version OS X, they logically refer to Applications on iOS devices in a cut down form too.

    And all of that doesn't matter. Apple refers to software as Applications because that's what the whole industry does. Microsoft, IBM, Google, Sun, HP, the industry has always used Application to refer to software (Program has also been used). App has always been the shortened form of Application, heck in the 80s, Visicalc was referred to as the "Killer app" for Apple computers.

    Your ranting as no relevance to the case at hand. Apple has no more claim to the term than anyone else and App or Application is not the trademark being discussed here.





    constellations in sky. constellations in sky.
  • constellations in sky.



  • innominato5090
    Feb 20, 01:24 AM
    New work machine.

    snip

    beautiful. I love the colors and the symmetry of your desk! may I ask you for a bigger pic?





    constellations in sky. A view of the winter night sky
  • A view of the winter night sky



  • claus1225
    Apr 2, 07:35 PM
    this commercial makes ipad seemed like it's only for kids.





    constellations in sky. Constellations on the starry
  • Constellations on the starry



  • torn
    Oct 2, 10:41 AM
    I also bought mine from ebay

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160479649119





    constellations in sky. Caption: Constellations in a
  • Caption: Constellations in a



  • macenforcer
    Nov 15, 04:22 PM
    They're going to have to go multi-thread capable, demands on consumer software is only going to increase as we take what is cutting edge today and integrate it into everyday life.


    Yes, and apple can start with QUICKTIME... for heaven's sake.





    constellations in sky. The summer constellations are
  • The summer constellations are



  • osxhero
    Apr 12, 09:31 PM
    People detection or NSA spoofer code. People should have the right to turn this stuff off. Hope FCP doesn't impose it without an option to disable.





    iris_failsafe
    Jul 13, 11:10 PM
    I think is too early for either HDDVD or Blue-Ray, maybe have it as a built to order option?

    It makes more sense than to put it as standard equipment





    richard.mac
    Apr 3, 01:20 AM
    yeah, i installed DP2 to a blank partition. didn't want any DP1 bugginess left over





    Edge100
    Sep 1, 12:28 PM
    I'm not sure about this one. It will depend on how agressively Apple prices these.

    I have a 20" iMac, and with my edu discount (at the time), I paid about $2500 (Canadian) for it with 2GB RAM (from Apple...was cheaper than anywhere else, believe it or not!), 256MB VRAM, and a 250GB HD.

    For about $350-450, I can get a decent (not great, but decent) 20" widescreen display and hook it up to my iMac, giving me 3360 x 1050 resolution, which is plenty wide enough to display 36+ faders in Logic, plus some other apps (Live, Reason) that I use with it. A 23" display would only give me 1920 x 1200.

    The point is: depending on how Apple prices it, I can get the 20" plus an external monitor and get more space for less money.

    I can see this working if (a) the 23" isn't substantially more expensive than the 20" AND (b) there are a few other things (i.e. bigger HD, more RAM, faster/better vid card) to distinguish the machines. This is the precise reason I didn't get the 500GB drive in my iMac...I went up to 250, but I could make up the additional 250GB over Firewire for a lot less.

    Either way, these should be sweet. I love my iMac (it does EVERYTHING I need today) and I don't anticipate upgrading for a number of years (well, maybe I'll slap in a Merom after the Applecare expires!)

    Anyway, just my two cents.





    Dagless
    Jun 22, 07:47 PM
    Ah yes. A porn free, tightly censored, code controlled desktop machine. That's what everyone wants right? :rolleyes:

    If that becomes the future (it is starting to feel that way a bit), then I'll be switching back to Windows full time.





    CWallace
    Jan 11, 07:43 PM
    they also think the macbook's gonna have a super drive standard across the line, so they're obviously not talking about the same thing

    Considering how inexpensive DVD burners are now, it probably costs Apple more to stock non-burners (for builds and AppleCare) in addition to burners then just moving purely to burners, so that would support a move to SuperDrives across the board.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment