Sunday, May 29, 2011

quality wallpapers

quality wallpapers. Quality wallpapers EXENDED
  • Quality wallpapers EXENDED



  • guzhogi
    Apr 11, 02:01 PM
    Could someone clarify this for me: Aren't hard drives too slow to make use of Thunderbolt anyway? In a typical USB 2.0 external hard drive, what is the bottleneck in speed: The speed at which the hard drive spins, or the USB 2.0 connection? If it's the USB, then why do people even care about the RPM of a drive? If it's the RPM, then isn't USB 2.0 fast enough to run a hard drive at its native speed?

    Look forward to thunderbolt hub. USB 3.0, esata and a DisplayPort daisy chain.

    What he said. You can get adaptors for different things, plus daisy chain multiple devices together. One device may not be able to use the whole TB bandwidth, but if you add a bunch of accessories to the same port, it'll add up. Right now, the only single device that might be able to utilize the whole bandwidth would be a RAID array and other high-end stuff. But as SSDs come more common & speed up, we'll see TB being more useful. This definitely won't happen overnight, no matter how much some of us might hope.





    quality wallpapers. like-a quality wallpaper,
  • like-a quality wallpaper,



  • Thex1138
    Apr 13, 07:35 PM
    Waiting for iPhone 5...
    :rolleyes:





    quality wallpapers. High Quality Wallpapers
  • High Quality Wallpapers



  • obeygiant
    Mar 8, 07:25 AM
    I wonder how Emilio Estevez is doing during all this..





    quality wallpapers. Quality Desktop Wallpapers
  • Quality Desktop Wallpapers



  • Erwin-Br
    Mar 31, 04:57 PM
    One of the things I used to hate about Windows were those programs that used their own butt-ugly skins. Seems that Lion is moving in that direction as well.

    *sigh* I know uniformity went out the window with iTunes, but this is getting ridiculous now.





    quality wallpapers. High Quality Wallpapers
  • High Quality Wallpapers



  • mikeschmeee
    Apr 14, 07:28 PM
    Behind the scenes....

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5187/5620100939_a0ef9a7b2b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5620100939/)





    quality wallpapers. High Quality Wallpapers
  • High Quality Wallpapers



  • appleguy123
    Apr 28, 01:06 PM
    What kind of story kills the main character a quarter of the way through???





    quality wallpapers. Holiday Wallpaper pack
  • Holiday Wallpaper pack



  • 840quadra
    Dec 1, 02:26 PM
    I agree with the few others that are concerned about this.

    Our Mac OS innocence is coming to an end. Part of this is due to the growing market share, and popularity in the Operating system. The other issue I feel that is of concern, is the new challenge this OS provides for Script kiddies, and bored coders. If you have an ego, and want to get your name out, why not do what hasn't been done before, as opposed to doing what everyone else does ?

    This is going to be a growing trend, and the amount of Mac Haters in the wild is quite high! Once code tricks and secrets start to get out, it is only a matter of time before OS X is targeted by thousands, much like XP!

    Apple has time to take this very seriously, and work to keep this system tight and secure! Hopefully this is going to be a big part of the focus on Leopard, but only developers will really know this!


    These current headlines aside

    1. Pay attention to what warning messages pop up when browsing the web.

    2. Only download and install software from sources that you trust, and if you do trust them, take an extra moment to think about why you trust them, and if you really need to install that piece of 3rd party software!

    3. Keep your firewalls on if possible

    4. Don't permanently unlock preferences, folders, or other security areas on your system using your keychain, unless you really need to do so!


    There are others, however that is a good baseline to follow for some minimal security checks and balances!





    quality wallpapers. High Quality Wallpapers
  • High Quality Wallpapers



  • lordonuthin
    Nov 30, 06:13 PM
    i recently got a ps3 slim, does ps3 folding rely on ps3 linux?

    I think it does, but check the FAQ page (http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-PS3).

    Shoulda' read the next post first, duh.





    quality wallpapers. wallpaper quality.
  • wallpaper quality.



  • gnasher729
    Apr 25, 07:50 AM
    I would beat the hell out of any dude that was in the same bathroom as my daughter.

    To give you an idea how mentally backwards this attitude is: In what is probably considered one of the most backward countries in the world, in Iran, the religious leaders are completely Ok with a transgender operation. To them, a man is a man, a woman is a woman, and a man or woman who has the bad luck to be born in the wrong kind of body should get help to get the problem fixed.





    quality wallpapers. Quality Wallpapers - 2011
  • Quality Wallpapers - 2011



  • dadoftwogirls
    Apr 22, 05:31 PM
    Yuck. What are they thinking? The tear drop looks hideous.





    quality wallpapers. High Quality Wallpapers
  • High Quality Wallpapers



  • grant6923
    Apr 14, 09:13 PM
    Just updated�Now having a problem with people hearing me. If i use speaker phone they can hear me just fine. I have done a voice memo, and it sounds like I'm being recorded at half volume. Anyone else having this problem :mad:





    quality wallpapers. Dove Background Wallpapers
  • Dove Background Wallpapers



  • Some_Big_Spoon
    Dec 3, 11:34 AM
    No one has it seems. There's reports of a few people running the beta, but it seems isolated. I think it was a release in name only. Hopefully we'll see something around MW in Jan? Who knows.



    Has anyone been getting updates at all from VMware? I sent in my request for Discussion Forums (a while back), but haven't gotten access.





    quality wallpapers. High Quality, Wallpapers
  • High Quality, Wallpapers



  • ialamo
    Mar 16, 02:41 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)

    I'm going to Brea around 6. Trying to get a Black 64 GB AT&T, for my Dad since he has to go to work. I know what a nice daughter :P

    Good Luck to everyone!





    quality wallpapers. High Quality Wallpapers
  • High Quality Wallpapers



  • Simgar988
    May 1, 11:32 PM
    I guess Osama Bin Ladin's iPhone tipped Pres. Obama off.





    quality wallpapers. high-quality wallpapers
  • high-quality wallpapers



  • lilo777
    Apr 23, 12:48 AM
    You enjoy seeing every issue from the perspective of someone who wants Apple to fail.

    Apple cares very deeply about their product, which is why they don't give in to every spec junkie who demands the latest and greatest immediately. The current chips don't give a usable battery life in Apple's eyes. If you want to get a phone that eats batteries that's your business, but Apple doesn't have an interest in developing anything like that.


    Nope. I see every issue from the consumer perspective - as I should (being a consumer). Any other perspective would be an abomination (unless for those who hold tons of AAPL shares).
    Phrases like "in Apple's eyes" is a good example of what I am talking about. Apple does not use iPhones, consumers do. Consumer eyse are the only eyes that matter. And that is exactly why people are switching to Android. If Apple cares more about what they think is right than what I think is right (for me) it would be stupid for me to care about what Apple thinks or does.


    They would still have to use two chips as I understand it: one to support CDMA and then the other to support LTE.

    I doubt that but even if that was the case then what? Every other phone manufacturer on the planet can design a phone that has LTE and Apple could not? Because they spend on R&D much less than any other hi-tech company of comparable size?

    And there we have it friends! This guy has no clue what he's talking about. There are no hybrid LTE/3G chips available yet, so the multiple chips thing has nothing to do with GSM/CDMA. If Apple wanted to support 3G AND LTE which they would have to do considering how scarce LTE is at the moment, the only way for them to do it is to use two chips. Battery life would drain.

    Here's a site for you to consider: Thunderbolt Battery Life (http://www.gottabemobile.com/2011/03/18/htc-thunderbolt-battery-life/)

    This is what people are talking about when they say the iPhone's battery life would be horrible. It has nothing to do with a hybrid CDMA/GSM chip, and has everything to do with the lack of a hybrid 3G/LTE chip.

    In fact, hybrid CDMA/GSM chips exist, and are already being used by Apple.

    You miss the point. I did not investigate the details about the number of chips. Not everyone cares. The point here is that there many people who want LTE and the there is Apple with their "single phone fits all" strategy. Here is a piece of relevant information for you from Information Week:

    "In its recently quarterly earnings report, Verizon Wireless noted that more than 500,000 customers signed up for LTE services and/or devices during its most recent quarter. Add that to the 65,000 who signed up in December, and Verizon has about 565,000 people using its next-generation wireless network. At this rate, Verizon may have more than 2 million 4G users by the end of the year.
    Of the 500,000 who signed up for 4G services this quarter, more than half (260,000) chose a 4G phone--the HTC Thunderbolt--that went on sale in mid-March. It scored a significant number of customers in its first two weeks of availability. That means between January 1 and March 15, about 240,000 people purchased other 4G devices, such as USB modems."

    As you can see 260K people bought HTC Thunderbolt since Verizon started selling them (about a month). This translates to about 3 million phones annually. Clearly the demand is there. Also, you keep forgetting that other phones have swappable batteries.





    quality wallpapers. high quality wallpapers 1280.
  • high quality wallpapers 1280.



  • Pandaboots
    Jan 26, 03:29 AM
    I've lost a bit. :( actually quite a lot. I bought at around 170ish a while ago in prepare for the surge of macworld like last year but am at a bit of a loss right now. I think my avatar shows my recent mood.

    You haven't lost anything until you actually sell. Maybe this story will help:

    Apple was the last stock I bought back during the dot com days of the late 90's/early 2000's. I got burned trying to buy and sell all the dot coms on a daily basis, so I decided that I'd "invest" what I had left in Apple. Anyway, I bought Apple at $49/share in the year 2000. I thought it was a great price for whatever reason. Guess what? The price fell to around $7 within a very short period of time. Go look at a chart and you will see the cliff in which I speak of. However, I didn't lose my cool. I was in it for the long haul, so I maintained my position. I think patience is key to investing. Long story short, I did sell at $200 recently because I wanted to diversify those earnings and made a 720% return on my investment. So essentially, my original investment more than doubled itself each year I owned the stock. Why $200? I don't know, they had been so close to it for a while that it just sounded like a good round number. Anyway, I've had my fair share of doubts throughout my 7 year stint with Apple. I never dreamed Apple would be at $200/share. I've seen huge dips in their price in short periods of time, and I've also seen huge gains too. I've also had the stock split on me too. I've also felt it was doomed and there's no way it could ever do this or ever do that....

    Think about what all has happened with Apple since 2000: I've seen OS X launched, the iPod launched, iTunes launched, the switch to flat screens, all the computers they've launched, iLife, iWork, iPhone, :apple:TV, addition of movies and tv shows, etc. etc. So here's why I invested in Apple in 2000:

    1) I loved the company
    2) I loved their products
    3) I got excited about their products
    4) I was a proud customer
    5) I actually kept up with what was going on with the company (mainly through appleinsider and then macrumors shortly thereafter)
    6) I knew Apple was innovative and had good leadership
    7) I read all of the magazines related to Apple and talked everyones ear off about Apple

    However, I didn't choose Apple because of the iPod (it didn't exist then), or whether or not they expected their 2nd qtr to be better than their all time greatest qtr in history. In a nutshell I chose Apple because I believed in their products/their management team/and their ability to produce a quality product that excites people.

    So, I guess what you have to ask yourself is, in the next 7 years where will Apple be as far as products and innovation? Only thing I know is since re-investing in them in December at $182, they've released :apple:TV 2, movie rentals, Macbook Air, Time Capsule, an 8 core mac pro and a pink nano (lol). I think Apple is poised and ready to dominate other markets now..pfft iPod, that's so 5 years ago, blah blah blah, Apple owns the market and will maintain their dominance, now it's time for them to dominate in the movies and the phones and hopefully in computers.

    If you think they are done, then I'd be worried and sell your shares as soon as you can. If you still believe in Apple, like I do, average down your shares while you can and hold on. At these prices right now, Apple can easily double in value again. They are better positioned than ever to take on their competition. All my 7 reasons above are as true today as they were 7 years ago and 7 years prior to that. :)





    quality wallpapers. high quality wallpapers
  • high quality wallpapers



  • SchneiderMan
    Sep 12, 11:22 PM
    I didn't buy it. A friend of mine from Israel bought it online for $13 and just shipped it to MA. So simple, isn't it? ;)

    Oh yeah, and there is that possibility :p





    quality wallpapers. Quality Wallpapers
  • Quality Wallpapers



  • csimmons
    Oct 19, 04:22 AM
    Yes, thank you. At least someone else out there is emotionally distanced enough from the iPod and the Apple entertainment sector to be a bit objective.

    Innovation: just what happened to Apple's innovative spirit when it comes to computers? The latest Mac Pro was fitted into the existing (and way oversized) G5 case. The MacBook was disappointing in that - proportionally - Apple did not shrink it at all or make it lighter than its predecessor (a design which had been in existence for about four years). There are more things, but I really don't want to sound like a troll here...

    Apple needs to come out with new computer models that are unlike anything else out there. What about a tiny, thin ultraportable? What about a smaller tower, so those of us that want a pro computer don't have to invest in an oversized monster (which is larger than any PCs in the market that I am aware of). Aren't computers supposed to get SMALLER as the technology advances? Why is Apple obsessed with making the iPod smaller and smaller, but does not care as much about its laptops and desktops?

    The answer: profit, or course. The iPod is Apple's cash cow. And this, my friends, is what I mean when I say that Apple needs to be partitioning off a little of its innovative energy that it is putting into its entertainment sector and bring it back to the computer line.

    Understood now?

    OK, now fire away :)

    Apple surely does it's homework, otherwise they wouldn't be as successful as they are currently. Perhaps their market research has shown them that there's no "real" market for an ultra-portable, pda, prosumer tower, or the other things that you and a few other have requested? the MP3 player market was a different animal, since the market was there already, albeit heavily segmented.

    Insisting over and over again that the iPod is Apple's cash cow when the facts state differently doesn't make sense. It's clearly a large part of Apple business, but it's CORE business is still computers. The numbers clearly show that.





    quality wallpapers. quality-wallpapers-windows
  • quality-wallpapers-windows



  • Funkatronic
    Sep 15, 01:33 AM
    Yeah, um, I really, really like Threadless. And Halo. Won't have to do laundry for a month straight now! :)

    Had to stock up on t-shirts when they had their $9 sale for 32 hours this past week!

    Holy mother of god!! A question though, do they charge shipping seperately for each tee, or if you have a giant-ass order does it get billed per box? (crate)

    I'm considering a mega tee order myself, but the international shipping rates are making me think twice.





    shanmugam
    May 3, 08:10 AM
    $100 says that in 2 months we will hear about screen flickering issues. :rolleyes:

    only specs are changed, i bet the screens are same.

    apple likes to keep the update minimum

    hope flicker does not come back for new owners!!! :cool:





    millypede
    Jul 24, 04:03 PM
    I would expect a release VERY soon as stock of the bluetooth mouse is well none...





    Consultant
    Jun 7, 12:40 AM
    I bet he's related to this guy:
    http://www.geekologie.com/2010/06/uhoh_star_wars_kid_is_now_a_la.php

    'Eleven-year-old "Accidentally" Downloads $1000 App' more like, the kid blatantly knew what he was doing, you can't accidentally buy something, he clicked 'buy', what was he expecting to happen...

    I know. It's pretty difficult to accidentally buy something from the App Store.





    creator2456
    Sep 12, 09:13 PM
    http://filmmusic.ru/images/Age_of_Empires_Collectors_Edition.JPG

    Couldn't find my old copy of the first game and been wanting a time-waster so I splurged and spent $5 on it in the discount bin. Get to play the sequels now too!





    tranceme
    Nov 10, 10:44 PM
    The reviews have been bad. My buddies at work can't get most sites to work. So, does this mean refunds? Or have people been getting this to work? Just curious.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment